Final Project
Marisol V.
Legislator:
John Whitmire, Senator
The most EVA
hours will be performed during the bolting and securing
of the hatches on the modules during connection. I
wanted to think of ways to make the process of
assembling the International Space Station safer,
easier, faster, and more cost efficient. Then, I
remembered how I enjoyed bringing magnets together as a
child to assemble play trains. I believe this process
may also be used to assemble the modules of the
International Space Station. I propose the process
of using electromagnets to unite the
modules.
To construct the
electromagnets on the electromagnetic hatchets, wire
would be coiled around alnico bars. An electromagnet is
a magnet that is temporarily attracted to each other by
the flow of electricity depending on the metal. The
electromagnets constructed would have positive and
negative charged particles. All magnets have north and
south ends. The fundamental law of magnets is that
opposites attract and likes repel. A magnetic field is
generated around the wire and it is amplified when the
wire is coiled.
There would be an
attraction between the electromagnets because, once
applying the electric current the atoms would rotate and
align making a pattern of positive and negative sides.
Since positive and negative electrons attract, the
electric current would flow through the electromagnets
on to the opposite hatchet. By turning on the
electricity to those modules the wire would gain
electricity/energy and the electromagnets would
automatically be attracted to each other. Electricity
for the electromagnets would be gained from the solar
arrays and accelerators or generators.
Using this
process, the EVA hours and time spent using the robotic
arm during assembly would be cut in half since the
modules would move together and connect from a distance.
The electromagnets would be electrically controlled and
the modules would be pulled into alignment with each
other by one of the robotic arms. The many cylindrical
electromagnets would have thousands of tightly bound
wires. This would create an enormous force. It would
have strength to pull the modules together at any
distance and hold strong. I performed an experiment by
making a small electromagnet. I wrapped 1000 coils
around two iron rods (500 each) and connected the ends
of the wires to a D cell battery. It had the strength to
hold up 200 pounds, so the electromagnets on the ISS
hatchets would have a tremendous force. The speedat
which they come in contact with each other is important
also. They cannot come in contact of each other at such
a high speed, because they could crash while docking.
The speed will be able to be regulated by turning the
amount of electricity that is applied. The shorter
process of attaching modules would now mostly consist of
connecting cables, pipes, and fittings.
Alnico will be
used because it has a high coercivity (it retains it’s
magnetism well) and a high remenance (it can be
magnetized strongly). This complex alloy metal makes a
permanent magnet. The higher a material’s remenance,
the stronger is its residual magnetism. The coercive
force (or coercivity) of a substance is the strength of
the magnetizing field necessary to reduce its remenant
magnetism to zero. It is a measure of how well a
material can retain its magnetism. Iron has a high
remenance but a low coercivity, so it can be magnetized
strongly but is easily demagnetized. Iron is a
soft magnet. Steel has a high coercivity but a low
remenance, so it makes weaker magnets. Steel is a hard
magnet.
It would be more
simple and safer to use these hatchets, because if a
part of the module becomes damaged or just needs fixing
all that would have to be done would be to turn the
power off to those modules, put the module in a
transport vehicle, and ship it off to NASA for
reconstruction. The modules would not be attracted to
each other without the electricity, because the domains
would return to their original position and the modules
would detach from each other. These hatchets are most
beneficial during major impacts. If one of the modules
were to be hit by particles of micrometeoroids to the
point where they pass all the way through the shell to
expose the module to the vacuum of space the astronauts
would have to get into their spacesuits and to either
repair what they can or regain things that may have been
lost.
If the spacesuits
were to be in the module on the other side of the
impacted one they could not pass through the damaged
module to get to their spacesuits. That would expose
them and the other module to the vacuum of space. If the
electromagnet hatchets were to be used, the astronauts
could just turn the electricity to those hatchets off
and the modules would disconnect. Then the robotic arm
would push the module from between the undamaged modules
and they would be connected. A gasket sheet would also
be needed over the ring of electromagnets to prevent air
from being between the linked cylinder heads of the
modules under pressure.
The astronauts
could be trained on the process by taking a class on the
science of the workings and visually seeing the process
in action by either computer simulation or virtual
reality. They could also do experiments with small
models. It would not take much money to build the
hatches and the astronauts would not have to train very
much after the long years they have already trained and
studied over everything else that happens in the
assembling. It is a simple process to turn on the
electricity and less time consuming.
The process of
this being used in space would seem almost fictional,
but the things I found about electromagnets, and how
they work with electricity and magnetism is very much
realistic. I believe my innovation could work for the
assembling of the International Space Station
efficiently. It would be safe, simple, and cost
efficient.
Sources:
“Magnetism.”
The World Book Encyclopedia of Sciences: Physics Today.
Vol. 2. May 2001: 130-135.
How Stuff Works:
Electromagnets. 1997. Inc. May 2001
<http://www.howstuffworks.com/electromagnet.htm>
Some Assembly
Required. March 1999. Aerospace Scholars. May 2001
<http://aerospacescholars.org/scholars/earthstationmoon/chapter3/lesson3.htm